Home

Simplifying Public Procurement
by Design

Design of the product that operated the new public procurement law — initially for purchases up to 30 UTM, later extended to 100 UTM — from strategy to interface components.

Role UX Lead · Strategy · Design
Client ChileCompra / Mercado Público
Users Government buyers + Suppliers
Compra Ágil — simplified public procurement interface

A new law, no product to run it

The new public procurement law established Compra Ágil: a special modality initially for acquisitions up to 30 UTM, later extended to 100 UTM. The promise was simple — more speed, less bureaucracy. The stakes were high: 80% of all State purchases fall within this range, and no digital tool existed to operate the new modality. Someone had to design it from scratch.

I led the design of that product: from strategic definition to interface components, including the flow architecture for both sides of the market — government agencies that buy and suppliers that quote.

The goal was not to digitize the existing process. It was to replace it.

Eliminate the technical requirements document. Remove intermediate administrative acts. Simplify the quotation process to a single step. If the flow is clear for both buyers and suppliers, cycle time drops and market participation grows.

A structured approach to an undefined problem

Designing a product from scratch — with no precedent and a hard launch deadline tied to a new law — required a clear methodology. We followed a Double Diamond process: understand deeply before defining, define before prototyping, and build in a feedback loop from day one.

Double Diamond process: Discovery, Define, Develop, Delivery, Monitoring with Continuous Improvement

The product serves two very different users simultaneously. Every design decision had to work for both sides of the market without creating asymmetry or confusion.

Compra Ágil flow: buyer and supplier parallel journeys across 8 steps

Listening to both sides before designing anything

We ran more than 30 in-depth interviews with public agencies and suppliers — hospitals, regional institutions, municipalities, and small businesses — using qualitative exploratory methods to understand their real experience with public procurement before touching any interface.

”We have to run a full tender to buy printer paper. The process is the same as for an infrastructure project.”

Procurement unit, public agency

”As a small supplier I have no way of knowing if there are purchases in my sector. I find out through contacts, not through the platform.”

Service provider, Metropolitan region

”An urgent purchase can take weeks. By the time the order arrives, I’ve already solved the problem another way.”

Head of supply, municipality

Mapping what didn’t exist yet

With the research findings clear, the work shifted to defining the product’s architecture before any screens. Each step had to be validated before moving forward.

Regulatory scope definition

Reading and synthesis of the new law. Interviews with the legal team and procurement units to understand exactly what the law mandates and what remained as a design decision.

Flow mapping for two profiles

The product has two sides: buyers who publish and suppliers who quote. I mapped both journeys separately before looking for convergence and divergence points.

Status system architecture

Before any screen, I designed the complete taxonomy of order statuses. Without that structure, the system has no criterion — only appearance.

Prototyping, validation and handoff

Iterative prototypes of the search interface, publishing form and order detail. Validation with real buyers from public agencies, then documentation for development.

A status system before any screen

Each status has its own meaning, semantic color and set of allowed actions. They are readable for both the buyer and the supplier equally — not just labels, but behavioral contracts that define what each user can do at every moment.

Purchase order issued

The buyer selected a quote and issued the order. The supplier must accept within the deadline. Highest urgency status for the supplier.

Published, receiving quotes

The purchase is active. Any enabled supplier can quote within the published deadline. Main opportunity status.

Second call

There were not enough quotes in the first call. The deadline is extended, a second opportunity for suppliers.

Deserted

No valid quotes were received. Terminal status, the buyer must start a new process.

Cancelled

The agency cancelled the purchase before completing the process. Can occur at any active stage.

Closed, awaiting results

The deadline ended. The buyer is evaluating proposals. Waiting status for the supplier.

Key design decision: statuses define what the user can do at each moment. The color, text and available actions change according to the status. The system has criterion, not just appearance.

The product went live the same day as the law

567,981Purchase orders issued

In less than two years of operation.

US$439MTotal transacted

Total volume processed through Compra Ágil since launch.

80%Awarded to SMEs

Of total amounts adjudicated went to micro, small and medium businesses.

4.5×Avg quotes per purchase

High competition rate — a transparent, open market in practice.

1Step to publish

Eliminated the technical requirements document and all intermediate administrative acts.

Day 1Live on launch of the law

The product launched the same day the new regulation came into effect.